This concept isn’t new and I suspect some of the good agile coaches practice this approach. If you are using a coach, I’d recommend using them as a Scrum Master on this team. The owner of the SDLC (or someone from this office) should act as product owner, and the ‘team’ should be representatives of your engineering teams and leaders for different skills (pm, ba, development lead, QA). With this structure, this team can help prioritize the backlog around the issues that are most needed. Also, for this team, I recommend an acceptance criteria around researching and leveraging best practices as part of a solution.
Another approach, good for larger organizations is to break this problem into tracks. So for example, one track around requirements, another on process maturity, another on engineering standards, and another around quality improvements.
One other benefit is that it he Los individuals participate in agile in more than one context (their project and now agile process maturity). It also helps senior management engage with teams on priorities, process needs, and governance.






















Leave a Reply